orders dominate our world. At one end of the spectrum, we find the closed society (or natural state) in which the dominant elites create rents from limiting entry to the economic and political system. At the other end, economic and political competition governs access to resources in so-called open access societies . Based on this synthesis, NWW lay out a unifying framework for the transition from closed to open access societies. Drawing on a wealth of historical examples, the authors posit that closed societies need to go through three doorsteps before transition
orders in the world today: an open access order and a limited access order. Both orders are able to solve the problem of containing violence but in very different ways. Most countries are characterized by limited access, which is why NWW call this social order the natural state . While the natural state has been in existence during the last 10,000 years, open access societies have only emerged in the last 300 years. Box 1 explains in more detail the differences between, and dynamics of, these two types of social order. One of the main contributions of NWW
(NWW) conclude on the basis of extensive historical analysis that natural states tend to perpetuate for very long periods of time, and that the transition from natural states to open-access societies is problematic and depends on the adaptation of their institutions, organizations, and behavior (“doorstep conditions”). Natural states exist on a continuum ranging from fragile states, characterized by political instability and violence at one extreme, to mature natural states—such as emerging markets—that are close to satisfying the doorstep conditions. Even today, few
access orders”) dominated by elites with primary access to power and resources, but vulnerable to violence and political conflict; and “open-access orders” characterized by competition in political and economic arenas. 2 They provide evidence that the transition to becoming an open-access society can take a long time, depending on the pace of adaptation of institutions, organizations, and behavior. Other writers on public choice and rent seeking, although not embracing the full implications of North, Wallis, and Weingast’s analysis, have nevertheless accepted the