would, owing to increasing inflation (expectations), limit the political options over time, thereby opening the door for the types of strategie approaches suggested in Nordhaus (1975) and MacRae (1977) . 39 Through their exhaustive econometric study, Goodhart and Bhansali (1970) were able to demonstrate the existence of a popularity cycle for the incumbent government 40 and of a considerable time lag of four to six months before changes in the economic variables appeared to affect government popularity. In conclusion, however, they cautioned their readers and
considers simultaneously the role of three political factors (electoral proximity, political strength, and institutional accountability) in explaining consolidation promise gaps; and third, it examines the consequences of promise gaps on market sentiment and government popularity among the electorate. The remainder of the chapter is organized as follows; the second section briefly discusses the data and the definition of the dependent variable. The third section explores the economic and political causes of consolidation promise gaps. The fourth section looks into the
political factors (electoral proximity, political strength and institutional accountability) in explaining consolidation promise gaps; and third, it looks at the consequences of promise gaps on market sentiment and governments’ popularity among the electorate. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 briefly discusses the data and the definition of our dependent variable. Section 3 explores the economic and political causes of consolidation promise gaps. Section 4 looks into the reaction of markets and the electorate to these gaps, and the
) reforms from 1973 to 2014. We then examined electoral outcomes such as reelection of the incumbent government party, its leader (usually the prime minister, or the president in presidential regimes), or the percentage of votes the incumbent government party received when reelected. We controlled for a wide range of other economic and political factors (for example, government popularity at the time of reforms, parliamentary support for the government), other country-specific characteristics, and global shocks that could affect reelection outcomes. Voters indeed seem