OECD industrial countries and, to the best of our knowledge, only two papers have analyzed the effect of labor market institutions for a broad sample of advanced and emerging economies: (i) Botero et al., (2004) analyze the effect of labor market regulations (employment laws, collective bargaining laws, and social security laws) on unemployment for a cross-country sample of 85 countries; (ii) Feldmann (2009) assesses the impact of labor market flexibility indicators (like those used in this paper) for a panel of 73 economies over the period 2000–03. Our paper
Front Matter Page Middle East and Central Asia Department Contents I. Introduction II. Data and Descriptive Statistics III. Empirical Methodology and Results A. Static Relationship Between Unemployment and Labor Market Institutions B. Dynamic Relationship Between Unemployment and Labor Market Institutions IV. Conclusions References Annex I: Data Description Figure 1. Cumulative Effect of Labor Market Flexibility on Unemployment Over Time Tables 1. Summary Statistics for Labor Market Outcomes and Flexibility Indicators 2
of Reforms vs. Crises on Unemployment-OLS 9. The Effects of Labor Market Policies on Unemployment-OLS 10. The Effects of Labor Market Policies on Unemployment-IV 11. The Effects of Gradual Labor Market Policies on Unemployment Tables 1. Summary Statistics for Labor Market Outcomes and Flexibility Indicators 2. Correlation Matrix of Labor Market Outcomes and Flexibility Indicators 3. Short- and Medium-Term Effects of Financial Crises on Unemployment: Flexible vs. Rigid Labor Markets 4. Medium-Term Effect of Labor Market Policies—OLS 5. Probability