election in LICs. Several fiscal outcomes (government consumption, public investment, breakdown of tax revenues, and budget balance as percentage of GDP) are used to assess the magnitude of the shocks on the budget during and after elections. The section also discusses the baseline econometric results. Baseline Specification and Data This chapter estimates several dynamic panel equations linking a given fiscal outcome with the election dummy while controlling for standard determinants of the given fiscal variable. As has now become standard in the literature on
= 1, 2). Additional covariates X it include mayor’s characteristics (gender, age, education, party affiliation, ideological stance), total per capita transfers received by municipalities, the proportion of people ages 15–64 years, and taxable per capita income, while μ i and λ t are municipality fixed effects and year effects, respectively. 10 Table 13.2 reports the estimates at the 5,000-inhabitant threshold of the political budget cycle effect (the α 0 coefficient of the election dummy W it ) and the fiscal rule effect on the political budget cycle (the
—Public Investment on Output D. The Impact of Growth on Public Investment E. The Impact of Public Investment and Growth on the Bilateral RER F. Effects of Natural Disaster and Elections VI. Conclusions Tables 1. ECCU: Rate of Return on Public Investment 2. ECCU: Rate of Return Compared Appendices I. ECCU Public Investment Model: Summary Statistics II. Correlation Matrix of Model Variables III. VAR Coefficients on Natural Disaster and Election Dummy Variables Figures 1. ECCU: Public Investment, Growth and Aid Inflows, 1975–2004 2. ECCU: Public Sector