Search Results
for potential mitigating policies and second, we investigate the well-being consequences of these two expansionary fiscal consolidations that took place in Denmark and in Ireland. To the best of our knowledge this paper is the first to investigate the well-being cost of fiscal consolidations. Our empirical analysis combines subjective well-being data covering over a half million of individuals across 13 European countries, with macroeconomic data on fiscal consolidations over the period 1980–2007. We rely on the exogeneity of fiscal consolidations identified with
. Small States: Composition of Government Debt: Domestic and External 4. Small States: Government Expenditure and Tax Revenues 5. Small States: Government Expenditure: Consumption vs. Investment 6. Response of GDP to +1 Percent Shock in Government Consumption 7. Response of GDP to +1 Percent of GDP Shock in Government Investment 8. GDP Cost of Fiscal Consolidation of 1 Percent of GDP 9. GIMF Model Country Setup 10. GDP Cost of Fiscal Consolidation of 1 Percent of GDP 11a. Permanent Consolidation of 1 Percent of GDP Using Lower Government Consumption
) Sources: WEO and IMF Staff Estimations. 13. The results are consistent with findings in other studies . The GDP cost of fiscal consolidations across different models—i) the current empirical study, ii) IMF Global Integrated monetary and Fiscal Model (GIMF)’s model, and iii) IMF’s 2018 Regional Economic Outlook: Western Hemisphere Department (REO WHD)’s estimates (2018) all show that public investment has a larger growth impact than current spending. 5 The growth impacts of government investment are much higher than those of the current spending. GDP Cost of