Creditable to all Taxpayers with Limits IV. Conclusions and Policy Recommendations References Box 1. The VAT Impact on Low Income Individuals in LICs and EMEs Figures 1. Bolivia, PIT (VCR) Revenue 2. VAT Revenue and VAT Non-Compliance (2008–2018) 3. Imports and VAT Revenue (2008–2018) Tables 1. Countries with VAT as a Credit or Deduction to the PIT 2. PIT and Tax Revenue by Group of Countries 3. Ecuador – The Revenue and Equity Impacts of Eliminating the PIT deduction allowed for Personal Expenses 4. Ownership of Financial Accounts and
of VAT revenue as a share of GDP was not statistically different from zero once the policy change was enforced. This result was consistent after accounting for changes in household final consumption, imports and tax expenditures. Figure 2. VAT Revenue and VAT Non-Compliance (2008–2018) Source: IMF Staff based on data from SAT and Banco de Guatemala. 20. We also found that changes in VAT collection were statistically explained by changes in the level of imports and final consumption (Appendix I, Table 1 , column 1) but not by the reform . A second
: Stylized Facts and Performance C. 2014 Tax Measures D. The Road Ahead BOXES 1. Progress and Challenges in Tax Administration 2. Mineral Taxation 3. The GST Withholding Schemes APPENDIX VAT Non-Compliance References
Caribbean and Central America countries have introduced them. Tax Revenue 13.7 18.7 17.5 25.2 Tax on income 4.0 5.0 5.4 11.6 PIT 1.2 1.5 1.6 8.9 CIT 2.0 2.8 3.1 2.8 VAT - ITBIS 4.9 5.4 6.4 6.7 Excise 2.8 1.7 1.7 2.6 On Inmovable Property 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.1 Others 1.3 0.7 1.8 1.6 VAT (ITBIS) Standard Rate 18.0 15.3 12.5 19.1 PIT Top Marginal Rate 25.0 23.7 29.3 35.7 PIT Lowest Rates 15.0 11.7 10.3 11.0 CIT Standard Rate 27.0 26.7 27.4 23.3 CIT and Dividend Rate 34.3 33.4 32.5 VAT Non-compliance 38.6 30.6 27.8 13.9 Tax Expenditure 6.7 3.8 3.5 - Table 1: Selected Tax