’s link with the country’s climate or development strategy, where high impact projects are often preferred. SSA authorities and other SSA climate finance recipients are often familiar with the requirements of international agencies and institutions as well as MDBs and bilateral agencies. This is the result of several decades of working with these financing providers on broader economic development projects. Consequently, even when a government may need to adopt new processes or procedures (including in project development and implementation)—especially as
, the prevalence of hard-to-model idiosyncratic shocks (for example, governance slippages), and a lower degree of banking system sophistication that may have given the impression of limited vulnerabilities. Even so, with the global financial crisis affecting SSA economies and banking systems, SSA authorities have increasingly embraced stress testing as an essen- tial tool to assess banking sector resilience and frequently report stress test outcomes to the public, for example, in financial stability reports (FSRs). This paper takes stock of the evolving stress
constraints, the prevalence of hard-to-model idiosyncratic shocks (for example, governance slippages), and a lower degree of banking system sophistication that may have given the impression of limited vulnerabilities. Even so, with the global financial crisis affecting SSA economies and banking systems, SSA authorities have increasingly embraced stress testing as an essential tool to assess banking sector resilience and frequently report stress test outcomes to the public, for example, in financial stability reports (FSRs). This paper takes stock of the evolving stress